Assessment of the MANTA closure device in real-life transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A single-centre observational study.

BACKGROUND: Vascular complications increase morbidity and mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Data involving suture-based percutaneous vascular closure devices (VCDs) have been extensive. Although promising, data regarding the efficacy and safety of the MANTA VCD (Teleflex) are scarce. We sought to assess the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA device in a real-life unselected cohort of patients undergoing transfemoral-TAVR (TF-TAVR). METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included a cohort of consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) treated by our team using TAVR between January 2020 to December 2022. The primary outcome measure was access-related major and minor vascular complications according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) definition criteria. RESULTS: From January 2020 to December 2022, a total of 347 patients underwent TF-TAVR were treated using the MANTA 18 Fr VCD system for vascular closure. Mean age was 82.4 ± 6.1 years (56-98 years). There were no significant differences in preoperative and procedural characteristics between patients with and without VCD-related major vascular complications. Access site-related major and minor vascular complications occurred in 20 of 347 patients (5.7%). Overall, major vascular complications occurred in 5 patients (1.4%) and device failure was seen in 17 patients (4.9%). CONCLUSION: This French real world evaluation of large-bore arteriotomy closure in TF-TAVR indicated that MANTA VCD is a feasible alternative with an acceptable low rate of access-site-related complications.

Sodium Chloride Physiological Saline Solution Versus Water Preparations Injectable in the Use of Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy: A Single-Center Experience.

Background: Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) coronary system is a very useful new technology for de novo severely calcified coronary artery plaques before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The device uses a semi-compliant low-pressure balloon, integrated into a sterile catheter, to deliver by vaporizing fluid an expanding bubble that generates high-pressure ultrasonic energy by waves that create multiplane longitudinal micro-macro fractures in calcified plaques, which facilitate optimal stent placement and expansion, and luminal gain. Methods: The use of Shockwave IVL coronary system in our cardiac catheterization laboratory (Cath lab) at the "Clinique Saint-Hilaire" in Rouen, France, started in March 2019, with 42 procedures performed since this date: two patients in 2019, two patients in 2020, seven patients in 2021, 23 patients in 2022, and eight patients since the beginning of 2023. Results: We had experienced problems at the beginning of our activity for the first 11 patients (two patients in 2019, two patients in 2020, and seven patients in 2021): after less than five pulses, the shock therapy stopped. We used initially for Shockwave IVL semi-compliant low-pressure integrated balloons a mixture of 50% contrast and 50% water preparations injectable (PPI). After changing water PPI by sodium chloride physiological saline solution, we never encountered this problem again for the following 31 patients (23 patients in 2022, and eight patients since the beginning of 2023). In fact, the proper functioning of Shockwave IVL system requires ions in balloon mixture in addition to the contrast. It is thanks to the ions contained in sodium chloride physiological saline solution that the spark necessary for shocks delivery after balloon inflation is produced. Conclusions: Water PPI or sodium chloride physiological saline solution is used in angioplasty balloons in a lot of Cath labs worldwide. It is therefore essential to disseminate in the worldwide Cath lab the obligation to put in Shockwave IVL semi-compliant low-pressure integrated balloons sodium chloride physiological saline solution, rather than water PPI for optimal performance, and the importance of Shockwave Medical reporting this to interventional cardiologists.

Comparison of outcomes in patients with or without ARC-HBR criteria undergoing PCI with polymer-free biolimus coated stents: The BioFreedom France study.

BACKGROUND: The polymer-free biolimus coated stent (BioFreedom) was shown to be superior to bare metal stents in the LEADERS FREE randomized trial in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients treated with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, there is limited outcome data with this device in an all-comers' population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-arm study of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with the polymer-free biolimus coated stent in 25 centers in France with wide inclusion criteria including multivessel disease, complex lesions, and acute coronary syndromes. The primary endpoint was the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI) or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (ci-TLR) at 1-year. The patient population was classified according to the presence (or not) of HBR criteria according to the recent ARC-HBR definition. RESULTS: Between April 2019 and April 2020, 1497 patients were enrolled. TLF occurred in 101 (6.9%) patients, including cardiac death in 35 (2.4%), target vessel MI in 20 (1.4%) and ci-TLR in 65 (4.5%) of them. There were 491 HBR patients (32.8%) and 1006 non-HBR patients. The median duration of DAPT was 74 days in the HBR group versus 348 days in the non-HBR group (p < 0.0001). TLF occurred in 44 (9.2%) of the HBR group and in 57 (5.8%) of the non-HBR group (relative risk 1.62 [95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.41], p = 0015). Compared to the non-HBR group, HBR patients had higher rates of cardiac death (4.4% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.0005) and target vessel MI (2.9% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.0003), but similar rates of ci-TLR. BARC 3-5 bleeding occurred in 6.2% of the HBR group versus 1.4% of the non-HBR group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this multicenter all-comers study, HBR patients treated with a polymer-free biolimus coated stent had, compared to non-HBR patients, an increased risk of cardiac death and MI, and despite a shorter duration of DAPT, continued to have higher rates of BARC 3-5 bleeding.

Polymer-free Biolimus-A9 coated thin strut stents for patients at high bleeding risk 1-year results from the LEADERS FREE III study.

BACKGROUND: In patients at high bleeding risk (HBR), the LEADERS FREE (LF) trial established the safety and efficacy of a polymer-free drug coated (Biolimus-A9) stainless steel stent (SS-DCS) with 30 days of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). In LEADERS FREE III, we studied a new cobalt-chromium thin-strut stent (CoCr-DCS) in HBR patients. METHODS: The CoCr-DCS shares all of the design features of the SS-DCS but has a CoCr stent platform with strut thickness of 84-88 µm. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and definite/probable stent thrombosis. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. Outcomes were compared to those of LF (non-inferiority to SS-DCS for safety and superiority to SS-BMS for efficacy). Additional propensity-matched comparisons were performed to account for baseline differences. RESULTS: We recruited 401 HBR patients using identical criteria to the LF trial. At 1 year, the primary safety endpoint was reached by 31/401 (8.0%) of patients treated with the CoCr-DCS versus 35/401 (8.9%) for the propensity-matched cohort (HR: 0.89, [0.55-1.44], p < 0.001 for non-inferiority, 0.62 for superiority). The efficacy endpoint was reached by 16/401 (4.2%) of CoCr-DCS patients versus 41/401 (10.6%) in the propensity-matched cohort (HR: 0.4 [0.2:0.7]) (p = 0.007 for superiority). There was no statistical difference between CoCr-DCS and SS-DCS in terms of efficacy (HR: 1.46 [0.68-3.15], p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: The new thin-strut CoCr-DCS proved non-inferior to the SS-DCS for safety, and superior to the BMS for efficacy in HBR patients treated with 30 days of DAPT.

Novel Supreme Drug-Eluting Stents With Early Synchronized Antiproliferative Drug Delivery to Inhibit Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation After Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation in Coronary Artery Disease: Results of the PIONEER III Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated endothelial healing after targeted antiproliferative drug delivery may limit the long-term inflammatory response of drug-eluting stents (DESs). The novel Supreme DES is designed to synchronize early drug delivery within 4 to 6 weeks of implantation, leaving behind a prohealing permanent base layer. Whether the Supreme DES is safe and effective in the short term and can improve long-term clinical outcomes is not known. METHODS: In an international, 2:1 randomized, single-blind trial, we compared treatment with Supreme DES to durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes. The primary end point was target lesion failure-a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. The trial was designed to demonstrate noninferiority (margin of 3.58%) of the Supreme DES at 12 months compared with DP-EES (URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03168776). RESULTS: From October 2017 to July 2019, a total of 1629 patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to the Supreme DES (N=1086) or DP-EES (N=543). At 12 months, target lesion failure occurred in 57 of 1057 patients (5.4%) in the Supreme DES group and in 27 of 532 patients (5.1%) in the DP-EES group (absolute risk difference, 0.32% [95% CI, -1.87 to 2.5]; Pnoninferiority=0.002]. There were no significant differences in rates of device success, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 12 months, and the safety composite of cardiovascular death and target vessel myocardial infarction was 3.5% versus 4.6% (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.46-1.25]) with Supreme DES compared with DP-EES, although rates of combined clinically and non-clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months were higher with Supreme DES. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the Supreme DES proved to be noninferior to the standard DP-EES. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03168776.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the Cobra PzF NanoCoated coronary stent in routine, consecutive, prospective, and high-risk patients: The e-Cobra study.

BACKGROUND: The Cobra PzF coronary stent is cobalt chromium with flat thin struts, nano-coated with Polyzene-F that enhance rapid reendothelialization and reduce the risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis. It is designed to overcome shortfalls of BMS and DES in patients requiring short DAPT duration. AIMS: To report procedural and 1-year clinical outcomes following Cobra PzF stent implantation in routine practice PCI. METHODS: e-Cobra registry is a multicenter prospective study to evaluate Cobra PzF stent in routine practice in patients deemed appropriate for short DAPT after PCI. The primary endpoint was MACE rate at 12 months (Cardiac death, MI, TLR). The secondary endpoint was definite stent thrombosis at 12 months. RESULTS: Among 940 patients (72% men, 72.8 ± 13.4 years) with multiple co-morbidities, 47% had acute coronary syndromes, and 62% were defined as high bleeding risk. A total of 1,229 lesions were treated with 1,314 stents. 36% of patients had lesion type B2 or C classification. Angiographic success was achieved in all cases. One-year follow-up was available for 97% of patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 9.0% of patients, including cardiac death 3.7%, MI 4.8%, and TLR 4.3%. Definite stent thrombosis occurred in six out of 915 (0.7%). CONCLUSION: The Cobra PzF stent was safe and effective in routine practice patients and seems feasible in situations when short DAPT or Mono Antiplatelet Therapy (MAPT) is needed. One-year follow-up was associated with satisfactory clinical outcomes and validate previously reported data.

A multicentre, randomised controlled clinical study of drug-coated balloons for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.

AIMS: Treatment of in-stent restenosis of coronary stents is challenging. The use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) is a promising technique to treat in-stent restenosis without adding another metal layer. The aim of the AGENT ISR randomised trial is to evaluate angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with ISR of a previously treated lesion who were treated with either a DCB with a new coating formulation (Agent) or a standard DCB (SeQuent Please). METHODS AND RESULTS: AGENT ISR is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study comparing the Agent and SeQuent Please DCB. A total of 125 patients (mean age ~68 years, 18% female) with in-stent restenosis of a previously treated lesion <28 mm in length were randomised at 11 sites in Europe to Agent (n=65) or SeQuent Please (n=60). The primary endpoint, six-month in-stent late lumen loss, in the Agent group (0.397±0.43 mm [n=51]) was non-inferior to that of the SeQuent Please group (0.393±0.536 mm [n=49]), as the two-sided upper 95% confidence boundary for the difference between groups was less than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 0.20 (difference 0.004, 95% CI [-0.189, 0.196]; pnon-inferiority=0.046). At one year, mortality was 3.1% in Agent and 1.7% in SeQuent Please patients (p>0.99), target lesion revascularisation 7.7% versus 10.0% (p=0.89), and stent thrombosis 0% versus 3.3% (p=0.44). Similar improvements in quality of life were seen in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this head-to-head comparison of two DCB, Agent proved to be non-inferior to SeQuent Please for in-stent late lumen loss at six months. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02151812 (http://clinicaltrials.gov/).

Five-year clinical outcome of multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus - with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term data from randomized studies on polymer-free stents are scarce. Long-term data of Cre8 amphilimus eluting stent are still not available. We sought to investigate contribution of a polymer-free design versus a permanent-polymer one on the long-term. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions were randomized 1:1 to Cre8 or Taxus Liberté (323 overall, 126 Cre8). Original primary endpoint (6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss) already demonstrated the superiority of Cre8 vs Taxus (0.14 + 0.36 mm vs. 0.34 + 0.40 mm; p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints were the device oriented composite endpoint (DOCE), patient oriented composite endpoint (POCE) up to 5-year. Long-term follow-up data confirmed the superiority shown by Cre8 in the analysis of the angiographic endpoint at 6-month, especially in the diabetic patients, where the device strongly reduced the clinical difference with non-diabetic. Landmark analysis demonstrated that the incidence of DOCE after 1-year and up to 5-year follow up was significantly lower in patients implanted with Cre8 AES (2.1% Cre8 vs. 9.3% Taxus, p = 0.009). While no differences were found in terms of DOCE rate among diabetic and non-diabetic patients treated with the Cre8 AES (HR 1.039; 95%CI 0.320-3.374), this was not true for Taxus (HR 2.64; 95%CI 1.112-6.278). CONCLUSIONS: Cre8 showed favourable safety and efficacy results versus Taxus at 5-years follow-up, with a superior clinical performance for the DOCE endpoint from 1 to 5 years. Cre8, differently from Taxus, has been able to strongly reduce the differences in clinical outcome between diabetic and non-diabetic up to 5 years, suggesting the higher efficacy of Cre8 in the treatment of diabetic patients.

Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: Results From the EXCEL Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether high-risk patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) and prior cerebrovascular disease (CEVD) preferentially benefit from revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). BACKGROUND: Patients with known CEVD requiring revascularization are often referred to PCI rather than CABG. There is a paucity of data regarding the impact of CEVD in patients with LMCAD undergoing revascularization. METHODS: In the EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) trial, patients with LMCAD and low or intermediate SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) scores were randomized to PCI with everolimus-eluting stents versus CABG. The effects of prior CEVD, defined as prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or carotid artery disease, on 30-day and 3-year event rates were assessed. RESULTS: Prior CEVD was present in 233 of 1,898 patients (12.3%). These patients were older and had higher rates of comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, chronic kidney disease, and prior PCI, compared with those without prior CEVD. Patients with prior CEVD had higher rates of stroke at 30 days (2.2% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.05) and 3 years (6.4% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.0003) and higher 3-year rates of the primary endpoint of all-cause death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (25.0% vs. 13.6%; p < 0.0001). The relative effects of PCI versus CABG on the 30-day and 3-year rates of stroke (pinteraction = 0.65 and 0.16, respectively) and the 3-year rates of the primary composite endpoint (pinteraction = 0.14) were consistent in patients with and those without prior CEVD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LMCAD and prior CEVD compared with those without CEVD have higher rates of stroke and reduced event-free survival after revascularization. Data from the EXCEL trial do not a priori support a preferential role of PCI over CABG in patients with known CEVD.

Biolimus A9 polymer-free coated stents in high bleeding risk patients undergoing complex PCI: evidence from the LEADERS FREE randomised clinical trial.

AIMS: The LEADERS FREE trial has demonstrated that a polymer-free Biolimus A9-coated stent (BA9-DCS) is superior to a bare metal stent (BMS) for high bleeding risk (HBR) patients when treated with one month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). This analysis aimed to determine the impact of PCI procedure complexity on the two-year results. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six hundred and sixty-seven (667) patients enrolled in the LEADERS FREE (BA9-DCS 346, BMS 321) underwent a complex PCI, defined by one or more of eight characteristics: total stent length ≥60 mm, ≥3 vessels or lesions treated, ≥3 stents implanted, bifurcation lesion treated with ≥2 stents, chronically occluded, restenotic or saphenous vein graft lesion. Patients undergoing complex PCI were older, more often male, and presented with more ACS, diabetes, renal insufficiency, anaemia and multivessel disease. They derived major benefit from DCS over BMS for safety (16.2% vs. 21.7%, HR 0.70 [0.49-0.99], p<0.05) and for efficacy (10.8% vs. 18.1%, HR 0.54 [0.35-0.83], p<0.005). For the 1,746 patients with non-complex PCI, DCS demonstrated superior efficacy (5.3% vs. 9.9%, HR 0.52 [0.36-0.75], p<0.001, p for interaction NS) and similar safety to BMS (11.1% vs. 12.6%, NS, p for interaction NS). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to BMS, the BA9-DCS maintained both efficacy and safety benefits when used in complex PCI procedures.

Safety and efficacy of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent in patients with diabetes: the EVOLVE II diabetes substudy.

AIMS: Bioabsorbable polymer drug-eluting stents (DES) may reduce the inflammation and delayed healing associated with some permanent polymer-coated DES. Whether late clinical outcomes are improved, particularly among patients with medically treated diabetes, is unknown. Therefore, we analysed outcomes from a pre-specified substudy of the EVOLVE II trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the SYNERGY stent in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS AND RESULTS: SYNERGY is a thin-strut, platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent with an ultra-thin bioabsorbable poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) abluminal polymer. The EVOLVE II randomised, controlled trial proved the non-inferiority of the SYNERGY versus the PROMUS Element Plus stent for one-year target lesion failure (TLF: ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation [ID-TLR], target vessel myocardial infarction [TVMI], or cardiac death). The pre-specified EVOLVE II diabetes substudy prospectively pooled randomised patients with diabetes (N=263) with a sequential single-arm diabetic cohort (n=203). The substudy primary endpoint was one-year TLF compared with a pre-specified performance goal (14.5%). The primary endpoint occurred in 7.5% of SYNERGY-treated patients with diabetes, significantly less than the performance goal (p<0.0001). The two-year rate of TLF was 11.2% (cardiac death 1.5%, TVMI 6.4%, ID-TLR 6.8%) and definite/probable stent thrombosis occurred in 1.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The EVOLVE II diabetes substudy demonstrates the efficacy and safety of the SYNERGY stent in patients with medically treated diabetes.

STENTYS Self-Apposing sirolimus-eluting stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the randomised APPOSITION IV trial.

AIMS: We sought to investigate the impact of the self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting STENTYS stent on midterm and long-term stent apposition and strut coverage compared with a zotarolimus-eluting balloon-expandable stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the APPOSITION IV trial, 152 STEMI patients were randomised (3:2) to the self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting STENTYS stent or a commercially available zotarolimus-eluting balloon-expandable stent at 12 sites in five countries with angiographic follow-up and optical coherence tomography at four or nine months. At four months, a lower percentage of malapposed stent struts was observed in the STENTYS group (N=21; Nstruts=501) compared with controls (N=26; Nstruts=326; 0.07% vs. 1.16%; p=0.002) with significantly more covered struts, using a 20 µm cut-off (94.32% vs. 89.09%; p=0.003). At nine months, the primary endpoint (percentage malapposed stent struts) was similar in both groups (STENTYS, N=40; Nstruts=566; control, N=21; Nstruts=292), showing complete apposition (p=0.55) and near total (>96%) coverage (p=0.58). CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, the self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting STENTYS stent was equivalent to a conventional drug-eluting balloon-expandable stent with respect to late stent strut apposition and coverage at nine months. However, stent strut apposition and coverage at four months were significantly better in the STENTYS group.

DANUBIO - a new drug-eluting balloon for the treatment of side branches in bifurcation lesions: six-month angiographic follow-up results of the DEBSIDE trial.

AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the role of drug-eluting balloon SB inflation, using the novel DANUBIO balloon, after placement of a drug-eluting stent in the main branch in patients with bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with bifurcation lesions suitable for stenting were enrolled in the DEBSIDE trial at eight French centres between May 2012 and July 2013. Two patients were excluded from the trial because of significant protocol deviations. Systematic Nile PAX stent placement was followed by final drug-eluting balloon inflation, using the DANUBIO balloon, according to the size of the side branch. Clinical follow-up was scheduled at one, six, and twelve months and an angiographic control at six months. The primary endpoint was six-month late lumen loss (LLL) at the ostium of the side branch. Secondary endpoints were main branch (MB) LLL, binary restenosis of the SB and MB, and clinically driven revascularisation rates for both branches. The procedural success rate was 100%. Angiographic control at six months post-procedure was performed in 48 patients (96%). Two patients with no reported clinical events refused the angiographic control. At six-month follow-up the primary endpoint of side branch LLL was -0.04±0.34 mm and the secondary endpoint of MB LLL was 0.54±0.60 mm. There was only one myocardial infarction (2%) and no reported cardiac deaths. Only one patient (2%) had a non-clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at the level of the side branch combined with a main branch revascularisation. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic final inflation of a DANUBIO balloon in the side branch after placement of a Nile PAX stent in the main branch for the treatment of a bifurcation lesion is safe and effective and results in very low LLL and a low restenosis rate at the side branch ostium. The DEBSIDE clinical trial was registered at the United States National Institute of Health website (NCT01485081).

Polymer-free Drug-Coated Coronary Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk.

BACKGROUND: Patients at high risk for bleeding who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) often receive bare-metal stents followed by 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. We studied a polymer-free and carrier-free drug-coated stent that transfers umirolimus (also known as biolimus A9), a highly lipophilic sirolimus analogue, into the vessel wall over a period of 1 month. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind trial, we compared the drug-coated stent with a very similar bare-metal stent in patients with a high risk of bleeding who underwent PCI. All patients received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary safety end point, tested for both noninferiority and superiority, was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. The primary efficacy end point was clinically driven target-lesion revascularization. RESULTS: We enrolled 2466 patients. At 390 days, the primary safety end point had occurred in 112 patients (9.4%) in the drug-coated-stent group and in 154 patients (12.9%) in the bare-metal-stent group (risk difference, -3.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.1 to -1.0; hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.91; P<0.001 for noninferiority and P=0.005 for superiority). During the same time period, clinically driven target-lesion revascularization was needed in 59 patients (5.1%) in the drug-coated-stent group and in 113 patients (9.8%) in the bare-metal-stent group (risk difference, -4.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -6.9 to -2.6; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.69; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at high risk for bleeding who underwent PCI, a polymer-free umirolimus-coated stent was superior to a bare-metal stent with respect to the primary safety and efficacy end points when used with a 1-month course of dual antiplatelet therapy. (Funded by Biosensors Europe; LEADERS FREE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01623180.).

Dedicated stents for distal left main stenting.

Left main (LM) coronary bifurcation lesions have different anatomic features from non-LM bifurcation lesions. Dedicated bifurcation devices might facilitate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of LM bifurcations and improve procedural and clinical outcomes. In this review we will discuss the available clinical data on dedicated bifurcation devices for the treatment of LM bifurcation lesions. Furthermore, we will try to discuss all the theoretical advantages and potential drawbacks of these devices in terms of their use in the LM.

Outcomes following implantation of the Biolimus A9-eluting BioMatrix coronary stent: Primary analysis of the e-BioMatrix registry.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of Biolimus A9-eluting stents (BES, BioMatrix™ and BioMatrix Flex™) in routine clinical practice. BACKGROUND: The LEADERS randomized trial has documented equivalent efficacy and superior safety of the BES when compared to a first generation Sirolimus-eluting Cypher(TM) stent. METHODS: 5,472 patients from 57 centers, treated with BES, were enrolled in an international multicenter registry and followed clinically up to 2 years. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 63.2 ± 11 years, 24% of patients had diabetes, and 49.8% presented with an acute coronary syndrome. 99.3% of patients were discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), 83.3% remained on DAPT at 1 year and 30.6% at 2 years. The incidence of the composite primary end point [major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months] was 4.5% [cardiac death 0.9%, myocardial infarction 1.7%, clinically indicated target vessel revascularization (ci-TVR) 2.8%]. MACE incidence was 6.8% at 24 months (cardiac death 1.5%, myocardial infarction 2.4%, ci-TVR 4.3%). At 12 months, 32 patients (0.6%) had suffered at least one definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST), and 91 patients (1.7%) a major bleed (MB). Nine patients with ST (27.3%) and 7 patients with a MB (7.7%) died during the first year after the index procedure. Between 12 and 24 months after implantation, there were 18 (0.4%) additional MB and 8 (0.2%) additional ST. CONCLUSIONS: This large international cohort documents a low 12 and 24 months MACE incidence and a very low ST incidence in an unselected patient population undergoing BES implantation. The results are in keeping with those of the randomized controlled LEADERS trial. Even though ST with this stent was a rare event, it was still associated with significant mortality. MB remains a problem, and warrants improved tailoring of DAPT in recipients of drug eluting stents.

Svelte integrated delivery system performance examined through diagnostic catheter delivery: the SPEED registry.

AIMS: The multi-center SPEED registry evaluated the procedural success and in-hospital clinical outcomes of direct stenting with the Svelte 'all-in-one' coronary stent Integrated Delivery System (IDS) through diagnostic catheters to identify the clinical indications for which this approach is appropriately suited. METHODS & RESULTS: Forty-eight (48) patients with 54 lesions of lengths ≤20 mm and RVD 2.5-3.5 mm were targeted for direct stenting through diagnostic catheters (4-6F) via radial or femoral approach. Procedural characteristics early in an investigator's experience (28 lesions) were compared with outcomes following experience (26 lesions). Procedure, device and strategy success were realized in 54 (100%), 50 (93%) and 46 (85%) lesions, respectively, with strategy success significantly related to RVD (P = 0.05), lesion location (P = 0.01), and diagnostic catheter size (P = 0.05). Significant improvement in crossing and intervention time and trends toward improvement in device and strategy success, reductions in procedure and radiation time and contrast use were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Direct stenting through diagnostic catheters via radial or femoral approach using the Svelte IDS is feasible and associated with good in-hospital outcomes. This approach offers the attractive option of assessing lesions via diagnostic catheter and, depending upon vessel anatomy and lesion morphology, continuing with ad-hoc interventional treatment using the same diagnostic catheter. Improvements in strategy success and procedural efficiencies, based on operator experience, facilitate catheter downsizing and reduce intervention time, ancillary product use and overall procedure costs. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

6- versus 24-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents in patients nonresistant to aspirin: the randomized, multicenter ITALIC trial.

BACKGROUND: The currently recommended duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in drug-eluting stent (DES) recipients is 12 months to reduce the risk of late stent thrombosis, particularly in those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). OBJECTIVES: This study hypothesized that antiplatelet treatment with DAPT for 6 months may be noninferior to 24-month DAPT in aspirin-sensitive patients. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized study assigned patients undergoing implantation of everolimus-eluting stents with confirmed nonresistance to aspirin to receive 6- or 24-month DAPT. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, stroke, and major bleeding at 12 months post-stenting. RESULTS: A total of 2,031 patients were enrolled in 70 European and Middle Eastern centers. The trial was prematurely terminated due to recruitment problems, leaving 941 patients randomized to 24-month DAPT and 953 to 6-month DAPT. The 2 treatment groups had similar baseline and procedural characteristics. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint (24-month: 1.5% vs. 6-month: 1.6%; p = 0.85). Noninferiority was demonstrated for 6- versus 24-month DAPT, with an absolute risk difference of 0.11% (95% confidence interval: -1.04% to 1.26%; p for noninferiority = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in stent thrombosis or bleeding complications. In the 792 (44%) high-risk patients with ACS, primary and secondary endpoints did not significantly differ (hazard ratio: 1.7 [95% confidence interval: 0.519 to 6.057; p = 0.361]). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of bleeding and thrombotic events were not significantly different according to 6- versus 24-month DAPT after PCI with new-generation DES in good aspirin responders. (Is There A LIfe for DES After Discontinuation of Clopidogrel [ITALICplus]; NCT01476020).

Polymer-free drug-coated coronary stents in patients at high beeding Risk

BACKGROUND:Patients at high risk for bleeding who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) often receive bare-metal stents followed by 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. We studied a polymer-free and carrier-free drug-coated stent that transfers umirolimus (also known as biolimus A9), a highly lipophilic sirolimus analogue, into the vessel wall over a period of 1 month.METHODS:In a randomized, double-blind trial, we compared the drug-coated stent with a very similar bare-metal stent in patients with a high risk of bleeding who underwent PCI. All patients received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary safety end point, tested for both noninferiority and superiority, was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. The primary efficacy end point was clinically driven target-lesion revascularization.RESULTS:We enrolled 2466 patients. At 390 days, the primary safety end point had occurred in 112 patients (9.4%) in the drug-coated-stent group and in 154 patients (12.9%) in the bare-metal-stent group (risk difference, -3.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.1 to -1.0; hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.91; P<0.001 for noninferiority and P=0.005 for superiority). During the same time period, clinically driven target-lesion revascularization was needed in 59 patients (5.1%) in the drug-coated-stent group and in 113 patients (9.8%) in the bare-metal-stent group (risk difference, -4.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -6.9 to -2.6; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.69; P<0.001)...